Beliefs about corruption and its valuation in university students and graduates of Lima and Callao. An exploratory study

Agustín Espinosa, María Cecilia Urcía

Abstract


e present study explores the beliefs and attitudes towards corruption of a group of middle-class and university-educated young people in the cities of Lima and Callao (n=22). A qualitative study was developed through in-depth interviews with a guide that inquired about three central themes (1) the conceptions about corruption, (2) the characteristics attributed to corruption and (3) the intention to become involved in acts of corruption. e results are contrasted with the definitions that from various organizations and from the social sciences have been developed on the subject. Specifically, participants identify three general conceptions of corruption. e structural conception of corruption defines it as a phenomenon rooted in institutions and normalized in society. e cultural definition presents corruption as a phenomenon with a historical foundation that influences people's identity, and the definition of direct corruption, which includes the daily manifestations of acts of corruption. e representation of the phenomenon is mostly negative, however there are some reasons when its presence is considered legitimate or necessary. Finally, the discussion shows how corruption erodes trust and affects life in society through the damage caused to the public sphere


Keywords


Corruption, Culture, Institutions, Normative Transgression.

Full Text:

PDF EPUB XML


DOI: https://doi.org/10.62174/psocial.7564

References


Agbo, A. & Iwundu, E. (2016). Corruption as a propensity: Personality and motivational determinants among Nigerians. The Journal of Psychology, 150(4), 502-526. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2015.1107523

Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Aliaga, H. (2012). Nuevas subjetividades transgresivas: un estudio sobre la viveza postcriolla. Tesis de Maestría, Escuela de posgrado, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.

Almagro, L. (2020). Prólogo. In C. Tablante & M. Morales (Eds.), Impacto de la corrupción en los derechos humanos (pp. 13-18). Instituto de estudios constitucionales del Estado de Querétaro. https://www.corteidh.or.cr/tablas/r37786.pdf

Alva, E., Vivas, V., & Urcia, M. (2021). Tolerance of Future Professionals Towards Corruption. Analysis Through the Attitudes of Students of Lima’s Universities Regarding Situations Related to Ethics and Morals. Journal of Academic Ethics, 19(2), 211-227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-019-09351-3

Anand, V., Ashforth, B., & Joshi, M. (2004). Business as usual: The acceptance and perpetuation of corruption in organizations. Academy of Management Perspectives, 18(2), 39-53. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2004.13837437

Arellano Gault, D. (2017). Corrupción como proceso organizacional: comprendiendo la lógica de la desnormalización de la corrupción. Contaduría y Administración, 62(3), 810-826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cya.2016.01.005

Ashforth, B. & Anand, V. (2003). The normalization of corruption in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 1-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(03)25001-2

Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo [BID] (2020). Transparencia, responsabilidad y anticorrupción. https://www.iadb.org/es/transparencia/transparencia-responsabilidad-y-anticorrupcion#:~:text=El%20Grupo%20del%20BID%20proh%C3%ADbe,las%20acciones%20de%20otra%20parte.

Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3) 193-209. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3

Barsky, A. (2011). Investigating the effects of moral disengagement and participation on unethical work behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0889-7

Basabose, J. D. D. (2019). The Concept of Corruption. In Anti-corruption Education and Peacebuilding (pp.13-45), Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03365-1

Beramendi, M., Espinosa, A., & Acosta, Y. (2020). Percepción del Sistema Normativo y sus Correlatos Psicosociales en Argentina, Perú y Venezuela. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 29(1), 13-27. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v29n1.75797

Beramendi, M. & Zubieta, E. (2013). Norma perversa: Transgresión como modelado de legitimidad. Universitas Psychologica, 12(2), 591-600. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy12-2.nptm

Blasi, A. (2005). Moral character: a psychological approach. In Lapsley, D. (Ed.), Character Psychology and character education (pp. 67-100). Indiana: University of Notre Dame.

Bock, T. & Samuelsson, P. (2014). Educating for moral identity. An Analysis of Three Moral Identity Constructs with Implications for Moral Education. Journal of Character Education, 10(2), 155–173. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/educating-moral-identity-analysis-three/docview/1699516417/se-2?accountid=28391

Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative research in psychology, 18(3), 328-352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238

Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Brumbach, B. H., Figueredo, A. J., & Ellis, B. J. (2009). Effects of harsh and unpredictable environments in adolescence on development of life history strategies. Human Nature, 20(1), 25-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-009-9059-3

Brytting, T., Minogue, R., & Morino, V. (2011). The anatomy of fraud and corruption: Organizational causes and remedies. Farnham, UK: Gower Applied Business Research.

Cabezas, V. D. & Paredes, V. L. (2020). La corrupción en 3D: una radiografía de sus componentes. Estado & Comunes, Revista De políticas Y Problemas Públicos, 1(10), 37-51. https://doi.org/10.37228/estado_comunes.v1.n10.2020.148

Casallas, O. L. V. (2020). Delitos de corrupción en Colombia: variables socioculturales, institucionales y criminológicas. Diversitas: Perspectivas en Psicología, 16(1), 181-199. https://doi.org/10.15332/22563067.5550

Cepeda, D. (2021). COVID-19 Corruption in 2021: August–September. The U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre at Chr. Michelsen Institute in Norway. https://www.u4.no/blog/covid-19-corruption-in-2021-augustseptember

Chugh, D. (2012). The motivation behind and Conditioning of Corruption in India. The Psychology of Corruption. Lady Shri Ram College for Women Finalist, Young Psychologist. Banglore: National Paper Presentation Competition, Christ University. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2117247

Comisión de Alto Nivel Anticorrupción (2013). Plan Nacional Anticorrupción 2012-2016. Presidencia del Consejo de Ministros [PCM].

Crano, W. D. & Prislin, R. (2006). Attitudes and persuasion. Annual Review of Psycholy, 57, 345-374. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190034

Creswell, J. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Londres: SAGE Publications.

Cuéllar, M. (2016). Percepciones y actitudes hacia la corrupción: una aproximación en estudiantes para suboficiales de policía. Bachelor Thesis, Facultad de Letras y Ciencias Humanas, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.

Dalton, M. (2002). Transgresiones. Desacatos, (9), 17-20. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1607-050X2002000100001&lng=en&tlng=es.

Defensoría del Pueblo (2013). ¡No Callar! Guía práctica para la denuncia ciudadana contra actos de corrupción y otras faltas contra la ética pública. Defensoría del Pueblo. https://www.defensoria.gob.pe/documentos/no-callar-guia-practica-para-la-denuncia-ciudadana-contra-actos-de-corrupcion-y-otras-faltas-contra-la-etica-publica/

Defensoría del Pueblo (2017). Radiografía de la corrupción en el Perú. Reporte La Corrupción en el Perú N°1. Defensoría del Pueblo. https://www.defensoria.gob.pe/modules/Downloads/documentos/Reporte-decorrupcion-DP-2017-01.pdf.

Delgado, J. (2013). Mecanismos atribucionales y actitudes hacia la transgresión de las normas de tránsito en conductores de taxi de Lima Metropolitana. Bachelor Thesis, Facultad de Letras y Ciencias Humanas, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.

De Klerk, J. (2017). “The devil made me do it!” An inquiry into the unconscious “devils within” of rationalized corruption. Journal of Management Inquiry, 26(3), 254-269. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492617692101

De Sousa, L. (2012). “Above the Law, below Ethics”: Some findings on Portuguese attitudes towards corruption. In D. Tänzler, K. Maras, & A. Giannakopoulos (Eds.). The social construction of corruption in Europe (pp. 245-263). Routledge.

Dezecache, G., Frith, C. D., & Deroy, O. (2020). Pandemics and the great evolutionary mismatch. Current Biology, 30(10), R417-R419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.04.010

Dimant, E. & Tosato, G. (2018). Causes and effects of corruption: what has past decade's empirical research taught us? A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 32(2), 335-356. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12198

Dong, B., Dulleck, U. & Torgler, B. (2012). Conditional corruption. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(3), 609-627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.12.001

Espinosa, A. (2003). Identidad social e identidad nacional en una muestra de triciclistas en Juliaca. Bachelor Thesis, Facultad de Letras y Ciencias Humanas, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.

Estévez, A. (2005). Reflexiones teóricas sobre la corrupción: sus dimensiones política, económica y social. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 10(29), 43-85. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=29002904

Fernández-Dols, J & Oceja, L. (1994). Efectos cotidianos de las normas perversas en la tolerancia a la corrupción. Revista de Psicología Social, 9(1), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1174/021347494763591762

Filgueiras, F. (2015). Corrupción y cultura política. Su Percepción en Brasil. In H. Telles & A. Moreno (Eds.), El votante latinoamericano. Comportamiento electoral y comunicación política (pp.159-183). México: Centro de Estudios Sociales y de Opinión Pública. Cámara de Diputados. http://www5.diputados.gob.mx/index.php/camara/Centros-de-Estudio/CESOP/Estudios-e-Investigaciones/Libros/El-Votante-Latinoamericano

Fisman, R., & Miguel, E. (2010). Chapter Four. Nature or Nurture? Understanding the Culture of Corruption. (2010). In Economic Gangsters. Corruption, violence, and the poverty of nations (pp. 159-183). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/0.1515/9781400834792-004

Gächter, S. & Schulz, J. (2016). Intrinsic honesty and the prevalence of rule violations across societies. Nature, 531(7595), 496-499. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17160

Gannett, A., & Rector, C. (2015). The rationalization of political corruption. Public Integrity, 17(2), 165-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2015.1000654

Gino, F., Ayal, S. & Ariely, D. (2009). Contagion and differentiation in unethical behavior: The effect of one bad apple on the barrel. Psychological Science, 20(3), 393-398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02306.x

Genemo, A. (2019). Perceptions and Attitudes of University Students towards corruption: the case of Adama Science and Technology University Prospective Graduates of 2005 EC. Master Thesis, Postgraduate School, Adama Science and Technology University.

Goldschmidt, J. & Anonymous. (2008). The necessity of dishonesty: police deviance,‘making the case’, and the public good. Policing & Society, 18(2), 113-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439460802008637

Gorsira, M., Denkers, A., & Huisman, W. (2018). Both sides of the coin: Motives for corruption among public officials and business employees. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(1), 179-194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3219-2

Graycar, A. (2015). Corruption: Classification and analysis. Policy and Society, 34(2), 87-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.04.001

Hadiprajitno, P. & Amal, M. (2019). Social constructs in predicting corruptive attitudes and behavior from the theory of planned behavior perspective. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 7(3), 167-177. https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/ijebaa/vviiy2019i3p167-177.html

Hu, Y., Hu, C., Derrington, E., Corgnet, B., Qu, C., & Dreher, J. C. (2021). Neural basis of corruption in power-holders. eLife, 10, e63922. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63922

Janos, E., Espinosa, A., & Pacheco, M. (2018). Bases ideológicas de la percepción del sistema normativo y el cinismo político en adultos de sectores urbanos del Perú. Psykhe, 27(1), 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.7764/psykhe.27.1

Jonason, P. & Webster, G. (2010). The dirty dozen: A concise measure of the dark triad. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 420-432. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019265

Jonason, P. K. & Webster, G. D. (2012). A protean approach to social influence: Dark Triad personalities and social influence tactics. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(4), 521-526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.023

Jonason, P. K., Koenig, B. L., & Tost, J. (2010). Living a fast life. Human Nature, 21(4), 428-442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-010-9102-4

Julián, M. & Bonavia, T. (2020). Variables psicológicas asociadas a la corrupción: una revisión sistemática. Anales de Psicología/Annals of Psychology, 36(2), 330-339. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.389371

Julián, M. & Bonavia, T. (2017). Aproximaciones Psicosociales a la Corrupción: Una Revisión Teórica. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 26(2), 231–243. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v26n2.59353

Justesen, M. K. & Bjørnskov, C. (2014). Exploiting the poor: Bureaucratic corruption and poverty in Africa. World Development, 58, 106-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.01.002

Köbis, N., Van Prooijen, J., Righetti, F., & Van Lange, P. (2016). Prospection in individual and interpersonal corruption dilemmas. Review of General Psychology, 20(1), 71-85. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000069

Kroll, J. & Egan, E. (2004). Psychiatry, moral worry, and the moral emotions. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 10(6), 352-360. https://doi.org/10.1097/00131746-200411000-00003

Li, H. & Meng, T. (2020). Corruption Experience and Public Perceptions of Anti-corruption Crackdowns: Experimental Evidence from China. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 25, 431–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-020-09672-w

López- López, W., Roa, M.A., Roa, D., Pineda-Marín, C., & Mullet, E. (2017). Mapping Colombian Citizens’ Views Regarding Ordinary Corruption: Threat, Bribery, and the Illicit Sharing of Confidential Information. Social Indicators Research, 133, 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1366-6

López-López, W., Roa, D., Roa, M.A., Correa-Chica, A., Pérez-Durán, C., & Pineda-Marín, C. (2016). El rol de la filiación política en las creencias y discursos legitimadores de la corrupción. Psychosocial Intervention, 25, 179-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psi.2016.07.001

Marin, L. O. (1999). Una mirada psicosociopolítica de la corrupción. Psicología Política, 19, 7-21. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2826287

Mejía Navarrete, J. (2018). La constitución del individualismo en el Perú. Pluriversidad, 1(1), 61-75. https://doi.org/10.31381/pluriversidad.v1i1.1670

Miranzo, J. (2018). Causas y efectos de la corrupción en las sociedades democráticas. Revista de la Escuela Jacobea de Posgrado, 14, 1-26. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6933060

Moya, E. & Paillama, D. (2017). Clientelismo y corrupción en contextos de baja estatalidad, una relación mutualista. Revista de Sociologia e Política, 25(64), 73-98. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-987317256406

Myint, U. (2000). Corruption: Causes, consequences and cures. Asia Pacific Development Journal, 7(2), 33-58. http://www.unescap.org/drpad/publication/journal_7_2/myint.pdf

Núñez, J. & Flanagan, C. (2015). Political beliefs and civic engagement in emerging adulthood. In J. J. Arnett (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of emerging adulthood (pp. 481–496). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199795574.013.21

Nordin, R., Takim, R., & Nawawi, A. (2013). Behavioural factors of corruption in the construction industry. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 105, 64-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.008

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Paulhus, D. & Williams, K. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of research in personality, 36(6), 556-563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6

Petty, R. E., Wheeler, S. C., & Tormala, Z. L. (2003). Persuasion and attitude change. In T. Millon & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology (2nd ed). New York: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471264385.wei0515

Portocarrero, F. (2005). El pacto infame: estudios sobre la corrupción en el Perú. Lima: Red para el desarrollo de las Ciencias Sociales en el Perú. http://hdl.handle.net/11354/2024

Pop, I. (2012). Acceptance of corrupt acts: A comparative study of values regarding corruption in Europe. Journal of Social Research & Policy, 3(1), 27-42. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/acceptance-corrupt-acts-comparative-study-values/docview/1318921019/se-2

Prabowo, H. Y. (2014). To be corrupt or not to be corrupt: Understanding the behavioral side of corruption in Indonesia. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 17(3), 306-326. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-11-2013-0045

Quiroz, A. (2013). La Historia de la Corrupción en el Perú. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos. Instituto de Defensa Legal. (Perú Problema, 38).

Rabl, T. & Kühlmann, T. (2008). Understanding corruption in organizations - development and empirical assessment of an action model. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 477–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9898-6

Rabl, T. & Kühlmann, T. (2009). Why or why not? Rationalizing corruption in organizations. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 16(3), 268-286. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527600910977355

Rabl, T. (2011). The impact of situational influences on corruption in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 85-101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0768-2

Roth, E. & Acosta, B. (2018). Disposición a sobornar: influencias contextuales e implicaciones cognitivas de la conducta corrupta. Ajayu Órgano de Difusión Científica del Departamento de Psicología UCBSP, 16(1), 60-81. http://www.scielo.org.bo/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2077-21612018000100003&lng=es&tlng=es

Rottenbacher, J. & Schmitz, M. (2012). Conservadurismo político y tolerancia hacia comportamientos transgresores, Psicología Política, 44, 31-56. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3974265

Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020

Sautu, R. (2014). La corrupción endémica en un país prebendario: un intento de construcción teórica. In E. Zubieta, J. Valencia, & G. Delfino (Eds.). Psicología Social y Política: Procesos teóricos y estudios aplicados, (pp. 103-128). ECOE Ediciones.

Sautu, R. (2002). La Integración de Métodos Cualitativos y Cuantitativos para el Estudio de las Experiencias de Corrupción. Cinta de Moebio, (13), https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=10101314

Serna, A. (2009). La corrupción como patología del bien común. El caso de Hong-Kong. Revista Empresa y Humanismo, 12(1), 121-188. https://revistas.unav.edu/index.php/empresa-y-humanismo/article/view/33276

Shalvi, S. (2016). Behavioural economics: Corruption corrupts. Nature, 531(7595), 456-457. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17307

Shalvi, S., Dana, J., Handgraaf, M. J., & De Dreu, C. K. (2011). Justified ethicality: Observing desired counterfactuals modifies ethical perceptions and behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 181-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.02.001

Sihombing, S. (2018). Youth perceptions toward corruption and integrity: Indonesian context. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39(2), 299-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2018.03.004

Soto, R. (2003). La corrupción desde una perspectiva económica, Estudios Públicos, 89, 23-62. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7871991

Superintendencia Nacional de Educación Superior Universitaria [SUNEDU] (2017). Informe bienal sobre la realidad universitaria peruana. https://repositorio.minedu.gob.pe/handle/20.500.12799/5716

Tangney, J.; Stuewig, J., & Mashek, D. (2007). Moral emotions and moral behaviour. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 345-372. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070145

Tavits, M. (2010). Why do people engage in corruption? The case of Estonia. Social forces, 88(3), 1257-1279. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.0.0288

Tepper, B. (2010). When managers pressure employees to behave badly: Toward a comprehensive response. Business Horizons, 53(6), 591-598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2010.07.002.

Transparencia Internacional (2009). Guía de lenguaje claro sobre lucha contra la corrupción.

Transparencia Internacional (2014). The Impact of Corruption on Growth and Inequality. This Anti-Corruption Helpdesk. https://knowledgehub.transparency.org/helpdesk/the-impact-of-corruption-on-growth-and-inequality

Tu, W., Yang, J., & Zheng, Y. (2020). Influence of individual values on attitudes toward corruption: What undermine formal anticorruption effectiveness. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 23(3), 264-277. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12402

Ubilluz, J. C. (2010). Nuevos súbditos: cinismo y perversión en la sociedad contemporánea, 2da edición, Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.

UNODC, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (2004). Handbook on Practical Anti-Corruption Measures for Prosecutors and Investigators. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/561662?ln=es

UNODC, United Nations Office on Drugs and crime (2020). UNODC and Corruption. https://www.unodc.org/lpo-brazil/en/corrupcao/index.html

Wall, J. & Fogarty, T.J. (2018). Robbing the Rich? 'Robin Hood' Fraud in the Securities Market. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3220026

Warf, B. (2018). Introduction to the Handbook on the Geographies of Corruption. In B. Warf (Ed.), Handbook on the geographies of corruption (pp.392), Edward Elgar Publishing. http://doi.org/10.4337/9781786434753.00005

Weisel, O. & Shalvi, S. (2015). The collaborative roots of corruption. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 112(34):10651-10656. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1423035112

Wenzel, K., Schindler, S., & Reinhard, M. (2017). General belief in a just world is positively associated with dishonest behavior. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 1770. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01770

World Bank (2014). World development report 2015: Mind, society, and behavior. World Bank Publications. https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/210751493925193701-0050022017/WDR-2015-Overview-Spanish

Wu, Y. & Zhu, J. (2016). When Are People Unhappy? Corruption Experience, Environment, and Life Satisfaction in Mainland China. J Happiness Stud, 17, 1125–1147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9635-7

You, J. (2018). Trust and corruption. In E, Uslaner (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of social and political trust, (pp. 473-496), Oxford University Press http://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190274801.013.22

Zaloznaya, M. (2014). The social psychology of corruption: Why it does not exist and why it should. Sociology Compass, 8(2), 187-202. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12120

Zhao, H., Zhang, H., & Xu, Y. (2016). Does the Dark Triad of personality predict corrupt intention? The mediating role of belief in good luck. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 608. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00608

Zhao, H., Zhang, H., & Xu, Y. (2019a). How social face consciousness influences corrupt intention: Examining the effects of Honesty–Humility and moral disengagement. The Journal of social psychology, 159(4), 443-458. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2018.1507992

Zhao, H., Zhang, H., & Xu, Y. (2019b). Effects of perceived descriptive norms on corrupt intention: The mediating role of moral disengagement. International Journal of Psychology, 54(1), 93-101. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12401


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Estadísticas
Visitas al Abstract:312
PDF:290
EPUB:39
XML:683


{PSOCIAL} Journal of Research in Social Psychology. Faculty of Social Sciences | University of Buenos Aires (UBA)

ISSN 2422-619X. Semiannual publication (January-June and July-December).
 
Design: Mae Bermudez
 
 Jorunal Indexed and listed in:
  • ERIH PLUS (European Reference Index for the Humanities and Social Sciences) [registry]
  • Latindex Catálogo 2.0 (Regional Cooperative Online Information System for Scholarly Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portuga) [registry]
  • DOAJ (Directory Open Access Journals) [registry]
  • MIAR (Information Matrix for the Analysis of Journals) [registry]
  • PSICODOC (Online Bibliographic Database Madrid Official College of Psychologists) [registry] 
  • RDIUBA (Institutional Digital Repository) [registry]
  • REDIB (Iberoamerican Network for Innovation and Scientific Knowledge) [registry]
  • Open AIRE (Open Access Infraestructure for Research in Europe) [registry] 
  • Red LatinRev / FLACSO library (Latin American Faculty of Social Sciences) [registry]
  • BINPAR (National Bibliography of Registered Periodicals) [registry]
  • LATINOAMERICANA (Association of Academic Journals of Humanities and Social Sciences) [registry]
  • CLASE (Latin-American Citations in Social Sciences and Humanities) [registry]
  • Sherpa Romeo [registry]
  • Basic Nucleus of Argentine Scientific Journals [registry]
  • Mirab@l [registry]
  • Cabells' Journalytics [registry]
  • CIRC (Integrated Classification of Scientific Journals) [registry]
  • AmeliCA [registry]
  • LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature [registry]
  • EBSCO (Elton Bryson Stephens Company Information Services) [registry]
  • Malena [registry] 
  • Sara Network [registry]
  • SciELO (Scientific Electronic Library Online) [registry]
  • Redalyc (Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America and the Caribbean, Spain and. Portuga) [registry]
 

This journal is licenced under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)