The present empirical study inquires on the relations among sexism, gender role ideology and domestic and care work in heterosexual women who share a home with their couples and at least one child, in CABA and GBA (Argentina) in 2019. Two previously existent
El presente estudio empírico indaga respecto a las relaciones entre el sexismo, la adhesión a la ideología del rol de género y la división del trabajo doméstico y de cuidados en mujeres heterosexuales que viven en pareja y tienen al menos une hije compartiendo el mismo hogar, en CABA y GBA (Argentina) en 2019. Se utilizaron dos escalas existentes
During the last decades, the study of
the multiple oppressions inscribed in the vital trajectories of women has been
widely approached by feminist theories. Within the diverse currents, emphasis
is placed on the articulation of different dimensions that allow to understand
power relations from more complex frameworks. The first criticisms in
this regard were raised by Radical
feminism in the 1960’s.
From this current, they have denounced women’s traditional role and the
attribution of different personality traits due to their sex, determining
domestic and care tasks as female responsibilities
Furthermore, from a materialist feminist conception,
In other words, the division of domestic work, problematized and linked to other axes of oppression, is studied by feminist theories from different perspectives. For its part, Latin America has not been oblivious to the conceptualizations coming from these mainly born in the United States and Europe currents. Various empirical studies on the division of domestic work carried out in our region have identified a trend towards these tasks mainly being performed by women, even among those who also work outside the home for a salary and regardless of social class, age or educational level. It has also been pointed out that the different household tasks are not homogeneously distributed between women and men, but rather that it is possible to observe trends towards less masculine participation in certain tasks —such as cleaning the house and washing and ironing clothes— and a greater in others —such as small home repairs—
This means that, just as it was denounced by radical feminism in the 1960s in the framework of the first feminist struggles against reproductive work, a double shift continues to fall on women
On another note,
It is then that the general objective proposed for this work consists of knowing the links between the level of ambivalent sexism, the level of adherence to the gender role ideology and the domestic and care work type of division in heterosexual women who share a home with their couple and at least one child, in Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires (CABA) and Gran Buenos Aires (GBA) in 2019. Within the specific objectives, firstly it is expected to describe the domestic and care work type of division according to the level of ambivalent sexism and the level of adherence to gender role ideology. Secondly, to study if the level of Ambivalent sexism predicts the domestic and care work type of division. Thirdly, to inquire if the level of adherence to the Gender Role Ideology predicts the domestic and care work type of division. The research was guided by the following hypothesis: it is expected that the level of sexism and adherence to the gender role ideology explain the domestic and care work type of division.
To answer the inquiries of this
research, a cross-sectional correlational study was carried out, with a
quantitative approach
The sample selection was intentional, non-probabilistic. A total of 437 women who live with their couples and have at least one child sharing the same home, residents of CABA and GBA during 2019, participated in the study.
Data was collected through a self-administered evaluation instrument sent by Facebook and WhatsApp social media, ensuring the anonymity of the participants. It included the following scales: Domestic and Care Work Division Scale —of own elaboration for this research—, Gender Role Ideology Scale and Ambivalent Sexism Inventory. Besides, socio-demographic information was requested —gender, age, number of hours worked per week, among other variables—.
Firstly, to investigate the domestic and care work type of division within households, an evaluation instrument constructed ad hoc was used. For this purpose, it was developed a scale that measured the level of traditionality in the division of unpaid work. It was understood that a task is carried out in a traditional way if it is the woman of the couple who mainly performs it, except for those that are frequently masculinized, such as small home repairments
As an example, one of the items is: ‘In my couple, the man takes care of our children when they get sick’ —the original item in Spanish is: ‘En mi pareja, el hombre es quien se encarga de cuidar a nuestros/as hijos/as cuando se enferman’—. The rest of the items can be read in Table 2. The 5 anchors of the Likert-type consisted of frequency levels —never, almost never, sometimes, almost always, always—. The items were written in such a way that the highest score corresponds to a higher level of traditionality. For this reason, some items were correspondingly inverted. Also, as it will be seen later, it is noteworthy that the original version of the implemented scale contained 18 items, 11 of which were subsequently eliminated in the reliability analysis.
Furthermore, the Gender Role Ideology scale, elaborated in Spanish by
The subjects were invited to participate in the research on a voluntary basis, requesting their consent. Before responding to the evaluation instrument, the participants were informed that the data derived from this research would be used exclusively for scientific purposes, under National Law 25.326 on the protection of personal data.
For data analysis, the following procedures were used. The psychometric property of reliability was analyzed through the Cronbach's Alpha test, the psychometric property of content validity was determined by means of an exploratory factor analysis, a confirmatory factor analysis was carried out in order to assess the data fitment to the model proposed, and also correlations and linear regression were performed. All of these procedures were carried out through the SPSS and EQS analytical tools.
Initially, the descriptive statistics for the Domestic
and Care Work Division Scale items were analyzed, together with the corresponding
Cronbach's alpha
Note. α: Cronbach’s
alpha; M: median; SD: standard deviation; rjx: item-total
correlation; α.-x: item-total
correlation if the element is suppressed.
Ítem
M
SD
rjx
α.-x
Domestic and Care Work Division
Scale
(α = 0,66)
6
13,3
14,25
0,41
0,62
7
13,94
13,89
0,37
0,62
8
13,48
14,36
0,33
0,63
10
12,74
12,92
0,36
0,63
13
13,72
13,81
0,46
0,60
15
14,16
14,56
0,26
0,66
17
13,85
13,57
0,44
0,60
In general, all the items contribute to the scale, each one presenting a relatively high correlation with the total. As was previously mentioned, the scale originally contained 18 items, 11 of which were eliminated after a first reliability analysis. The results presented hereinafter correspond to the final version of the Domestic and Care Work Division Scale, which consists of the 7 items detailed in this section.
An exploratory study by main components with one
factor was carried out with the 7 items that compound the Domestic and Care Work Division Scale.
The factor loadings of the items are presented in
Item
Factor 1
6. En mi pareja,
el hombre es quien se encarga de cuidar a nuestros/as hijos/as cuando se
enferman
0.64
7. En mi pareja, la mujer limpia el baño
0.56
8. En mi pareja, el hombre es quien
lava y cuelga la ropa
0.50
10. En mi pareja,
es la mujer quien principalmente cuida a los/as mayores de la familia
0.57
13. En mi hogar, cuando los/as
chicos/as tienen un problema o están tristes, en general se acercan a la
madre más que al padre
15. En mi pareja, el hombre es
quien plancha la ropa
0.68
0.42
17. En mi pareja, la mujer es
quien asiste a las actividades o reuniones del colegio o jardín de infantes
de nuestros/as hijos/as
0.66
From the results obtained in the exploratory
study, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was carried out in order to know
the data fitment to the model proposed. In
NNFI
CFI
IFI
RMSEA
One factor
0.85
0.90
0.90
0.07
Descriptive statistics for the ad hoc
constructed scale, Ambivalent Sexism and Gender Role Ideology scales are
presented below. From
Moreover, it is noteworthy that only for the Domestic and Care Work Division Scale extreme values of the lowest possible score can be found. Conversely, for the Ambivalent Sexism and Gender Role Ideology scales, extreme values with higher scores are present. In turn, the range of the first mentioned scale is 3 points, lower than those corresponding to the sexism and gender stereotypes scales —3.45 and 3.25 points, respectively. Regarding the standard deviation, it can be seen that the highest value is presented by the Ambivalent Sexism scale, while the lowest is for the case of the unpaid work. However, calculating the coefficients of variation, it is found that in the first case this is 22.2% compared to 26.4% in the second. In other words, the results corresponding to the scale constructed in this work show a slightly higher heterogeneity.
Min.
Max.
M
SD
Domestic and Care Work Division
1.00
4.00
2.27
0.60
Ambivalent Sexism Inventory
1.55
5.00
3.65
0.81
Gender Role Ideology
1.75
5.00
4.07
0.72
Subsequently,
the correlations among the Domestic and Care Work Division Scale, Ambivalent Sexism
—differentiating the two factors that compose it— and Gender Role Ideology variables
were calculated
1
2
3
4 5
1. Domestic and Care Work Division
—
2. Benevolent sexism
0.318
**
—
3. Hostile sexism
0.236
**
0.680
**
—
4. Ambivalent Sexism Inventory
0.308
**
0.888
**
0.935
**
—
5. Gender Role Ideology
0.344
**
0.691
**
0.636
**
0.731
**
—
Regarding
the effect of the independent variables on the dependent variable, the B
statistic allows to inform about the extent to which the division of domestic
and care work varies with respect to ambivalent sexism and gender role
ideology. The Beta coefficient was used as an estimator of the magnitude in
which the independent variables were predictors of the variability in the
division of domestic and care work as a dependent variable. In a first
analysis, it was observed that Ambivalent Sexism does not present a
statistically significant relationship (p = 0.067) as an independent variable
within the linear regression model. Therefore, a new model was generated,
excluding this variable, to analyze the effect of the Gender Role Ideology on
the division of domestic work
B 95%
CI
SE
b
t
p
Constant
1.083
[0.775, 1.392]
0.157
6.895
0.000
Gender Role Ideology
0.024
[0.018, 0.030]
0.003
0.344
7.643
0.000
The main objective of this work consisted of knowing the links among the level of ambivalent sexism, the level of adherence to the gender role ideology and the domestic and care work type of division for heterosexual women who live with a partner and at least one child. With this purpose, a scale that would allow to assess the type of division of unpaid labor in households was constructed, in order to be able to appreciate the correspondence between people's perceptions and the tasks they actually carry out. The Domestic and Care Work Division Scale is made up of 7 items: 3 correspond to domestic tasks and 4 to care tasks. The distribution is considered to be mostly of a traditional type if it corresponds to an arrangement in which women are mainly who carry out housework and care work. This situation is consistent with a higher score on the aforementioned scale.
It could be seen that all the items presented contribute to the scale, which presents a Cronbach's α of 0.66. Likewise, from the exploratory study by main components it appears that it is composed of a single factor. Based on these results, the AFC showed that the CFI and the IFI have a value of 0.90, whilst the NNFI is 0.85. On the other hand, the RMSEA value was 0.07. In other words, the data presents a good adjustment to the model proposed, with an adequate mean square error of approximation. In turn, when studying some descriptive statistics, it is found that the level of traditionality in the division of household labor is relatively low in the present sample (2.27 points). For the level of Ambivalent Sexism, the mean was 3.65 points. Likewise, the respondents show a high level of Gender Role Ideology (4.07 points).
Regarding the correlations among the different variables in this study, a high positive correlation (r = 0.731) was found between the Gender Role Ideology and Ambivalent Sexism, as well as between the first variable and both components of the second. These results are not surprising, since it is expected that those who understand gender identities within rigid and limited frameworks are also those who present a higher level of prejudice towards women. On the other hand, a moderate positive correlation was found between the Domestic and Care Work Division Scale and the Gender Role Ideology (r = 0.344). In other words, those who show greater adherence to gender stereotypes tend to be also those who have a mostly traditional division of labor within their homes. In the same way, a moderate correlation was also found between the constructed scale and Ambivalent Sexism, although weaker than in the previous case (r = 0.308). This means that among women with higher levels of ambivalent sexism there is a slight tendency to present a traditional division of domestic work. It is then possible to suggest that, to some extent, there exists a relationship between people's perceptions and the activities that they actually carry out in the same direction.
Finally, regarding the regression analysis of the proposed model, it was appreciated that Ambivalent Sexism does not present a statistically significant relationship as an independent variable. When proposing an alternative model, linking the Domestic and Care Work Division Scale with the Gender Role Ideology as the only independent variable, the latter is presented as the explanatory variable that integrates the model. The adjusted R² value obtained is 0.116, which indicates that 11.6% of the variance in the division of domestic and care work is explained by the gender role ideology. It is then possible to suggest that the hypothesis proposed is partially corroborated: the domestic and care work type of division is explained by the level of adherence to the gender role ideology. In other words, a higher level of adherence to gender stereotypes corresponds to a greater tendency towards a traditional division of labour within the households.
In closing, some limitations outlined in this study should be noted. Firstly, the type of instrument used does not allow investigating the senses that can lead women and men to participate in a different way in domestic chores, which could be done using a mixed methodology that allows the implementation of a qualitative approach in addition to the application of scales. Secondly, the unit of analysis comprised only women, whereby the incorporation of the male voice is pending. In turn, in light of the results presented in different Latin American studies, it is worth asking about the links between the participation of people in domestic and care work and other variables such as participation in paid work, social class, hiring a domestic employee and the age of minors present, among other possible incident factors. As indicated at the beginning of these lines, feminist theories focus on studying the different ways in which multiple axes of inequality overlap in women's lives. In this way, numerous questions remain open to be explored in future research on the division of domestic and care work in Argentina.