Perspectivas psicológicas en el estudio del autoritarismo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62174/psocial.3454Palabras clave:
psicología social, autoritarismoResumen
Altemeyer (1996), sostiene que han habido tres importantes líneas de investigación en relación al autoritarismo desde una perspectiva psicológica. La primera de estas fue desarrollada por el grupo de Berkeley (Adorno, Frenkel-Brunswik, Levinson & Sanford, 1950), que genero un estudio empírico en torno al constructo del autoritarismo, pensándolo a partir del constructo de personalidad autoritaria. Mientras que la segunda línea, fue realizada por Rokeach (1960), quien propuso el concepto de dogmatismo, para poder evaluar al autoritarismo, sin importar el posicionamiento ideológico. Finalmente la última línea, es la propuesta por Altemeyer (1981), el cual piensa al fenómeno del autoritarismo como un conglomerado actitudinal. Si bien se hallan numerosos estudios sobre autoritarismo en el habla hispana, ninguno de ellos ha realizado una revisión sistemática sobre la historia de este constructo. Es por ello que el objetivo de este trabajo fue realizar una revisión sobre el estudio del autoritarismo desde abordajes psicológicos.
Referencias
Adorno, T., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. & Sanford, R. (1950). The authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper.
Ahrens, C. R. & Innes, J. M. (1994). Attribution of right-wing authoritarianism as a function of self-perceived political opinion. Journal of Social Psychology, 134, 383-385.
Asbrock, F., Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2010). Right‐wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice: A longitudinal test. European Journal of Personality: Published for the European Association of Personality Psychology, 24(4), 324-340.
Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-Wing Authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.
Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Altemeyer, B. (1996). The Authoritarian Spectre. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Brewer, M. B. (2001). "Ingroup identification and intergroup conflict: When does ingroup love become outgroup hate?", en: Ashmore, R. y Jussim, L. (eds.). Social identity, intergroup conflict, and conflict reduction. Nueva York, NY: Oxford University Press. p. 17-41.
Cabot, M. (2007). Más que palabras. Estética en tiempos de cultura audiovisual. Murcia: Cendeac.
Cantal, C., Milfont, T. L., Wilson, M. S., & Gouveia, V. V. (2015). Differential effects of Right‐Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation on dimensions of generalized prejudice in Brazil. European Journal of Personality, 29(1), 17-27.
Christie, R., & Jahoda, M. (1954). Studies in the scope and method of “The Authoritarian Personality”. Glencoe, Il: Free Press.
Cohrs, J. C., & Asbrock, F. (2009). Right‐wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and prejudice against threatening and competitive ethnic groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(2), 270-289.
Corrales, J. (2005). In Search of a Theory of Polarization: Lessons from Venezuela, 1999-2005. European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, (79), 105–118. DOI: http://doi.org/10.18352/erlacs.9666
Corrales, J., & Penfold, M. (2011). Dragon in the Tropics: Hugo Chávez and the Political Economy of Revolution in Venezuela. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Cramer, D. (2004). Emotional support, conflict, depression and relationship satisfaction in a romantic partner. Journal of Psychology, 138(6), 532-542.
Deutsch, K. W., Platt, J., & Senghass, D. (1971). Conditions favoring major advances in Social Science. Science, 171, 450-459.
DiRenzo, G. J. (1967). Professional politicians and personality structures. American Journal of Sociology, 73, 217-225.
Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. Em M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 41- 113. San Diego: Academic Press.
Duckitt, J. (2006). Differential Effects of Right Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation on Outgroup Attitudes and Their Mediation by Threat From and Competitiveness to Outgroups. Personality & social psychology bulletin, 32. 684-96.
Duckitt, J. (2009). Authoritarianism and dogmatism. In M. Leary & R. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of Individual Differences in Social Behavior (pp. 298-317). New York: Guilford Press.
Duckitt, J., Bizumic, B., Krauss, S. W., & Heled, E. (2010). A Tripartite Approach to Right-Wing Authoritarianism: The Authoritarianism-Conservatism-Traditionalism Model. Political Psychology, 31(5), 685-715. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00781.x.
Duckitt, J. & Fisher, K. (2003). The impact of social threat on world view and ideological attitudes. Political Psychology, 24, 199-222.
Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2007). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. European Journal of
Personality, 21, 113-130.
Duriez, B., & Van Hiel, A. (2002). The march of modern fascism: A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1199-1213.
Eysenck, H. J. (1954). The Psychology of Politics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Feldman, R. (2003). Enforcing social conformity: A theory of authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 24, 41-74.
Ferguson, C. J. y Dyck, D. (2012). Paradigm change in aggression research: The time has come to retire the General Aggression Model. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17, 220-228. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2012.02.007
Ferri, E. (1887). Los nuevos horizontes del derecho y el procedimiento penal, Madrid, Centro Editorial de Góngora. p. 28. También SC., II, p. 8.
Finlayson, J. G. (2005). Habermas: a very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Freud, S. (1921/1998). Psicología de las masas y análisis del yo. En J. Strachey (Ed.) Obras completas de Sigmund Freud. Volumen XVIII. Más allá del principio de placer, Psicología de las masas y análisis del yo, y otras obras (1920-1922). Buenos Aires: Amorrortu editores.
Fromm, E. (1941/2008). El miedo a la libertad. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Funke, F. (2005). The dimensionality of right-wing authoritarianism: lessons from the dilemma between theory and measurement. Political Psychology, 26, 195-218.
Giampaglia, G. & Roccato, M. (2002). La scala di autoritarismo di destra di Altemeyer: Un’analisi con il modello di Rasch per la costruzione di una versione italiana. Testing, psicometria e metodologia, 9, 93-111.
Gómez, R. (1998). Weber, Lukács y la Escuela de Frankfurt. Herencias no reconocidas y diferencias teóricas desde una perspectiva práctico-política. Revista Herramienta, 34. Recuperado de http://www.herramienta.com.ar/revista-herramienta-n-34/we-ber-lu-kacs-y-la-es-cue-la-de-frank-furt-he-ren-cias-no-re-co-no-ci-das-.
Heaven, P. C. L., & Bucci, S. (2001). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and personality: An analysis using the IPIP measure. European Journal of Personality, 15, 49-56.
Heaven, P. C. L., & Connors, J. C. (2001). A note on the value correlates of Social Dominance Orientation and Right wing Authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 925-930.
Horkheimer, M. (1936/1972). Critical Theory: Selected Essays. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Kteily, N., Sidanius, J., & Levin, S. (2011). Social dominance orientation: Cause or ‘mere effect’?: Evidence for SDO as a causal predictor of prejudice and discrimination against ethnic and racial outgroups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 47. 208-214. 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.09.009.
Le Bon, G. (1895/2012). The Crowd: Study of the Popular Mind. EE.UU.: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
Manganelli Rattazzi, A. M., Bobbio, A., & Canova, L. (2007). A short version of the Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1223-1234.
Mavor, K., Louis, W. & Sibley, C. (2010). A bias-corrected exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of right wing authoritarianism: Support for a three-factor structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 28-33. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.08.006.
Mayorga, R. A. (2009) Sociedad civil y Estado bajo un populismo plebiscitario y autoritario en Cynthia Arnson (ed.): La Nueva izquierda en América Latina: Derechos humanos, participación política y sociedad civil, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, DC, 109-119.
McFarland, S. G., Ageyev, V. S., & Djintcharadze, N. (1996).Russian authoritarianism two years after communism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 210-217.
Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to Authority. NY: Harper Row.
Perry, R., & Sibley, C. (2012). Big-Five personality prospectively predicts Social Dominance Orientation and Right-Wing Authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences. 52. 3–8. 10.1016/j.paid.2011.08.009.
Perry, R., & Sibley, C. G. (2013). A dual‐process motivational model of social and economic policy attitudes. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 13(1), 262-285.
Petersen, L. E., & Dietz, J. (2000). Social discrimination in a personnel selection context: The effects of an authority's instruction to discriminate and followers.
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M. y Malle, B. F. (1994). Social Dominance Orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.67.4.741
Reich, W. (1933/1980). The mass psychology of fascism. UK: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Rokeach, M. (1948). Generalized mental rigidity as a factor in ethnocentrism. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 43, 259-278.
Rokeach, M. (1952). Dogmatism and opinionation on the left and on the right. American Psychologist, 7, 310.
Rokeach, M. (1960). The open and closed mind. New York: Basic Book Inc.
Rubinstein, G. (2003). Authoritarianism and its relation to creativity: A comparative study among students of design, behavioral sciences and law. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 695-705.
Sears, D. O., Huddy, L., & Jervis, R. (2003). Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Seoane, J., & Garzón, A. (1992). Escala de Autoritarismo de Derechas (RWA). Adaptación de la escala de B. Altemeyer. Psicología Política, 5, 27-52.Shills, E. (1954). Authoritarianism: Right and left. Em Richard Christie., & Marie Jahoda (Eds.), Studies in the scope and method of “The authoritarian Personality” (pp. 24-29). Glencoe: Free Press.
Sibley, C. G. & Duckitt, J. (2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 248–279.
Sibley, C. G. & Duckitt, J. (2009). Big-five personality, social worldviews, and ideological attitudes: Further tests of a dual process cognitive-motivational model. The Journal of Social Psychology, 149, 545–561.
Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2010). The personality bases of ideology: A one-year longitudinal study. The Journal of Social Psychology, 150(5), 540-559.
Sibley, C. G. & Duckitt, J. (2013). The dual process model of ideology and prejudice: A longitudinal test during a global recession. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153, 448–466.
Sibley, C. G., Harding, J. F., Perry, R., Asbrock, F. & Duckitt, J. (2010). Personality and prejudice: Extension to the HEXACO personality model. European Journal of Personality, 24, 515–534.
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance. Cambridge, MASS: Cambridge University Press.
Sidanius, J. y Pratto, F. (2004). "Social Dominance Theory: a new synthesis", en Jost, J. y Sidanius, J. (eds.). Political Psychology. Nueva York, NY: Psychology Press. p. 315-332. doi: 10.1017/ CBO9781139175043.002
Sighele, E. (1890/2006). La muchedumbre delincuente. Madrid: La España moderna.
Smith, A. G., & Winter, D. G. (2002). Right-wing authoritarianism, party identification and attitudes toward feminism in student evaluations of the Clinton-Lewinsky story. Political Psychology, 23, 355-383.
Stone, W. F., Lederer, G., & Christie, R. (1993). Strength and weakness: The authoritarian personality today. New York: Springer Verlag.
Šubrt, J. (2001). The Problem of Time from the Perspective of the Social Sciences. Czech Sociological Review, 9(2), 211-224.
Ungaretti, J., Etchezahar, E., & Brussino, S. (2015). La percepción de peligro y competencia como factores predictores del prejuicio hacia diferentes grupos sociales. Escritos de Psicología - Psychological Writings, 8 (1), 30-37.
Van Hiel, A., Cornelis, I., & Roets, A. (2007). The intervening role of social worldviews in the relationship between the five-factor model of personality and social attitudes. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 21(2), 131–148.
Van Hiel, A., Duriez, B., & Kossowska, M. (2006). The presence of LeftWing authoritarianism in Western Europe and its relationship whit Conservative ideology. Political Psychology, 27, 769-793.
Weyland, K. (2013). Latin America’s Authoritarian Drift: The Threat from the Populist Left. Journal of Democracy, (3), 18-32.
Whitley, B. E. (1999). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(1), 126-134.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Los/as autores/as conservan los derechos de autor, garantizan a la revista el derecho de ser la primera publicación del trabajo y aceptan que los artículos publicados por esta revista se encuentran disponibles bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución No Comercial Compartir Igual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0): los/as interesados/as pueden compartir (copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato) y adaptar (remezclar, transformar y crear a partir del material otra obra), siempre que: a) se cite la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra); b) no se usen para fines comerciales; c) se mantengan los mismos términos de la licencia. Este tipo de licencias se basan en el principio de la libertad creativa con fines académicos, científicos y culturales.
