Effects of the need for cognitive closure on decision-making styles: an exploratory approach

Emilio Antonio Recart Zapata, Luis Jaume, Manuel Passero, Susana Azzollini

Abstract


Decisional styles refer to habitual cognitive patterns used by subjects in decision-making tasks when they process the information. Recent research has referred to the role played by the epistemic motivation of the Need for Cognitive Closure in information processing. This influence can generate a biased processing affecting decision making. This is because NCC brings two consequences in information processing. The first one is the Urgency where individuals tend to a generalized search for information generating more hypotheses until the cognitive threshold is exceeded. The second refers to Permanence, where once the threshold is surpassed, the information crystallizes and is extrapolated to other areas. The present exploratorystudy aimed to explore the relationship between the Need for Cognitive Closure and Decision Styles. For this purpose, a sample of 378 individuals residing in the City of Buenos Aires and Greater Buenos Aires was taken. The Revised Test of Need for Cognitive Closure (TR-NCC) and the Decision-Making Styles (DE) scale were used to assess the variables. The resultsindicate that although there is no strong relationship between the two variables, this exploratory approach should be further explored in future research.

Keywords


Necesidad de Cierre Cognitivo, Estilos decisorios, Urgencia , Permanencia



DOI: https://doi.org/10.62174/%7bpsocial}.v7i2.7233

References


Abubakar, A. M., Elrehail, H., Alatailat, M. A., & Elçi, A. (2019). Knowledge management, decision-making style and organizational performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4(2), 104-114.

Appelt, K. C., Milch, K. F., Handgraaf, M. J., & Weber, E. U. (2011). The decision making individual differences inventory and guidelines for the study of individual differences in judgment and decision-making research. Judgment and Decision making.

Billieux, J., Rochat, L., Rebetez, M. M. L., & Van der Linden, M. (2008). Are all facets of impulsivity related to self-reported compulsive buying behavior?. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(6), 1432-1442. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2007.12.011

Chirumbolo, A., Livi, S., Mannetti, L., Pierro, A., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2004). Effects of need for closure on creativity in small group interactions. European Journal of Personality, 18(4), 265-278. doi: doi.org/10.1002%2Fper.518

Dewberry, C., Juanchich, M., & Narendran, S. (2013). Decision-making competence in everyday life: the roles of general cognitive styles, decision-making styles, and personality. Personality and Individual Differences , 55 (7), 783-788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.06.012

Djeriouat, H., & Trémolière, B. (2014). The Dark Triad of personality and utilitarian moral judgment: The mediating role of honesty/humility and harm/care. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 11–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.12.026.

Evans, J. S. B. (2017). Spot the difference: distinguishing between two kinds of processing. Mind & Society, 11(1), 121-131. doi: 10.1007/s11299-012-0104-2

Higgins, E. T. (2011). Accessibility theory. Handbook of theories of social psychology, 1, 75.

Horcajo, J., Díaz, D., Gandarillas, B., & Briñol, P. (2011). Adaptación al castellano del Test de Necesidad de Cierre Cognitivo. Psicothema, 23(4), 864-870.

Hunt, R. G., Krzystofiak, F. J., Meindl, J. R., & Yousry, A. M. (1989). Cognitive style and decision making. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 44(3), 436-453. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(89)90018-6

Galotti, K. M., Ciner, E., Altenbaumer, H. E., Geerts, H. J., Rupp, A., & Woulfe, J. (2006). Decision-making styles in a real-life decision: Choosing a college major. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(4), 629-639.

Gati, I., Landman, S., Davidovitch, S., Asulin-Peretz, L., & Gadassi, R. (2010). From career decision-making styles to career decision-making profiles: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76(2), 277-291.

Jaume. L, Cervone, N., Biglieri, J., & Quattrocchi, P. (2015). Propiedades psicométricas del Test revisado de Necesidad de cierre cognitivo (TR-NCC) en una muestra de estudiantes de la Universidad de Buenos Aires. Investigaciones en psicología, 20(3), 55-60.m as motivated social cognition. Psychological bulletin, 129(3), 339. doi: https://doi/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339

Jaume, L. C., Roca, M., Passero, M., & Azzollini, S. (2021). La teoría epistémica laica y su enfoque cognitivo-motivacional del conocimiento. Persona, 24(2), 11-26. https://doi.org/10.26439/persona2021.n024(2).5438

Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological bulletin, 129(3), 339.

Krzystofiak, F. J., Meindl, J. R., & Yousry, A. M. (1989). Cognitive style and decision making. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 44(3), 436-453. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(89)90018-6

Juliusson, E. Á., Karlsson, N. & Gärling, T. (2005). Weighing past and future in decision making. European journal of cognitive psychology, 17 (4), 561-575. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440440000159

Keen, P. G., & McKenney, J. L. (1974). The implications of cognitive style for the implementation of analytic models. Massachusetts, institute of technology.

Kirby, K. N., & Maraković, N. N. (1996). Delay-discounting probabilistic rewards: Rates decrease as amounts increase. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 3(1), 100-104. doi: 10.3758/BF03210748

Kruglanski, A. W. (1980). Lay epistemo-logic—process and contents: Another look at attribution theory. Psychological review, 87(1), 70. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.87.1.70

Kruglanski, A. W. (1989). Lay epistemics and human knowledge. Springer US: New York.

Kruglanski, A. W. (1990). Lay epistemic theory in social-cognitive psychology. Psychological Inquiry, 1(3), 181-197. 10.1207/s15327965pli0103_1

Kruglanski, A. W., Dechesne, M., Orehek, E., & Pierro, A. (2009). Three decades of lay epistemics: The why, how, and who of knowledge formation. European Review of Social Psychology, 20(1), 146-191. doi: 10.1080/10463280902860037

Kruglanski, A. W., & Freund, T. (1983). The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19(5), 448–468. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(83)90022-7

Kruglanski, A. W., & Gigerenzer, G. (2011). Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles. Psychological review, 118(1), 97. https:/doi/10.1037/a0020762

Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1991). Group members' reactions to opinion deviates and conformists at varying degrees of proximity to decision deadline and of environmental noise. Journal of personality and social psychology, 61(2), 212. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.212

Kruglanski, A. W., Raviv, A., Bar-Tal, D., Raviv, A., Sharvit, K., Ellis, S., ... & Mannetti, L. (2005). Says who? Epistemic authority effects in social judgment. Advances in experimental social psychology, 37, 345-392.

Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: "seizing" and "freezing". Psychological review, 103(2), 263–283. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.103.2.263

Marqués, G., & Weisman, D. (2011). Teoría estándar de la decisión y teoría prospectiva: Consideraciones filosóficas respecto al cambio teórico. Economía, (31), 55-83. ISSN: 1315-2467

Mayseless, O., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1987). What makes you so sure? Effects of epistemic motivations on judgmental confidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39(2), 162-183. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(87)90036-7

Metin, B., Roeyers, H., Wiersema, J. R., van der Meere, J. J., Thompson, M., & Sonuga-Barke, E. (2013). ADHD performance reflects inefficient but not impulsive information processing: A diffusion model analysis. Neuropsychology, 27(2), 193.

doi: 10.1037/a0031533

Parker, A. M., De Bruin, W. B. & Fischhoff, B. (2007). Maximizers versus satisficers: decision-making styles, competition, and outcomes. Judgment and Decision Making , 2 (6), 342.

Pierro, A., y Kruglanski, A.W. (2005). Revised Need Cognitive Closure Scale. Manuscrito no publicado, Università di Roma, La Sapienza

Roets, A., & Van Hiel, A. (2011). Item selection and validation of a brief, 15-item version of the Need for Closure Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(1), 90-94. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.004

Roets, A., Van Hiel, A., & Cornelis, I. (2006). The dimensional structure of the need for cognitive closure scale: Relationships with “seizing” and “freezing” processes. Social Cognition, 24(1), 22-45. doi: 10.1521/soco.2006.24.1.22

Ruggieri, V. L. (2013). Empatía, cognición social y trastornos del espectro autista. Revista de neurología, 56(1), 13-21. doi: 10.33588/RN.56S01.2012666

Peer, E., Egelman, S., Harbach, M., Malkin, N., Mathur, A., & Frik, A. (2020). Nudge me right: Personalizing online security nudges to people's decision-making styles. Computers in Human Behavior, 109, 106347.

Schumpe, B. M., Brizi, A., Giacomantonio, M., Panno, A., Kopetz, C., Kosta, M., & Mannetti, L. (2017). Need for cognitive closure decreases risk taking and motivates discounting of delayed rewards. Personality and Individual Differences, 107, 66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.11.039

Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1995). Decision-making style: The development and assessment of a new measure. Educational and psychological measurement, 55(5), 818-831.

doi: 10.1177%2F0013164495055005017

Simuth, J., & Sarmany-Schuller, I. (2010). Cognitive and decision making styles. Exploring styles to enhance learning and teaching in diverse contexts [proceedings]. Aveiro: Universidade de Aveiro, 467-470. ISBN: 9789727893126

Sosa, J. T. R., Ojeda, M. A., & Del Rosario, L. R. (2011). Teoría de la mente, reconocimiento facial y procesamiento emocional en la esquizofrenia. Revista de psiquiatría y salud mental, 4(1), 28-37. doi: 10.1016/j.rpsm.2010.11.005

Spicer, D. P., & Sadler‐Smith, E. (2005). An examination of the general decision making style questionnaire in two UK samples. Journal of Managerial Psychology. doi: 10.1108/02683940510579777

Webster, D. M., Richter, L., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1996). On leaping to conclusions when feeling tired: Mental fatigue effects on impressional primacy. Journal of experimental social psychology, 32(2), 181-195. doi: 10.1006/jesp.1996.0009

Wester, S.R., Christianson, H.F., Fouad, N.A., Santiago-Rivera, A.L. (2008). Information processing as problem solving: A collaborative approach to dealing with students exhibiting insufficient competence. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 2(4), 193-201. DOI: 10.1037/1931-3918.2.4.193.

WinkielMan, P., & Schooler, J. (2008). Unconscious, conscious, and metaconscious in social cognition. Social cognition: The basis of human interaction, 49-69.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Estadísticas
Visitas al Abstract:640
PDF (Español (España)):267
EPUB (Español (España)):93
HTML (Español (España)):182
XML (Español (España)):185



{PSOCIAL} Journal of Research in Social Psychology. Faculty of Social Sciences | University of Buenos Aires (UBA)

ISSN 2422-619X. Semiannual publication (January-June and July-December).
 
Design: Mae Bermudez
 

 Jorunal Indexed and listed in:
  • ERIH PLUS (European Reference Index for the Humanities and Social Sciences) [registry]
  • Latindex Catálogo 2.0 (Regional Cooperative Online Information System for Scholarly Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portuga) [registry]
  • DOAJ (Directory Open Access Journals) [registry]
  • MIAR (Information Matrix for the Analysis of Journals) [registry]
  • PSICODOC (Online Bibliographic Database Madrid Official College of Psychologists) [registry
  • RDIUBA (Institutional Digital Repository) [registry]
  • REDIB (Iberoamerican Network for Innovation and Scientific Knowledge) [registry]
  • Open AIRE (Open Access Infraestructure for Research in Europe) [registry
  • Red LatinRev / FLACSO library (Latin American Faculty of Social Sciences) [registry]
  • BINPAR (National Bibliography of Registered Periodicals) [registry]
  • LATINOAMERICANA (Association of Academic Journals of Humanities and Social Sciences) [registry]
  • CLASE (Latin-American Citations in Social Sciences and Humanities) [registry]
  • Sherpa Romeo [registry]
  • Basic Nucleus of Argentine Scientific Journals [registry]
  • Mirab@l [registry]
  • Cabells' Journalytics [registry]
  • CIRC (Integrated Classification of Scientific Journals) [registry]
  • AmeliCA [registry]
  • LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature [registry]
  • EBSCO (Elton Bryson Stephens Company Information Services) [registry]
  • Malena [registry
  • Sara Network [registry]
  • SciELO (Scientific Electronic Library Online) [registry]
  • Redalyc (Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America and the Caribbean, Spain and. Portuga) [registry]
 

This journal is licenced under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)