Psychological perspectives in the study of authoritarianism

Luis Jaume, Marcelo Agustin Roca, Jochay Ben Tovim

Abstract


Altemeyer (1996), maintains that there have been three important lines of research regarding authoritarianism from a psychological perspective. The first of these was developed by the Berkeley group (Adorno, Frenkel-Brunswik, Levinson & Sanford, 1950), who generated an empirical study around the authoritarian construct, thinking about it from the authoritarian personality construct. While the second line was made by Rokeach (1960), who proposed the concept of dogmatism, in order to evaluate authoritarianism, regardless of ideological position. Finally, the last line is the one proposed by Altemeyer (1981), who thinks of the phenomenon of authoritarianism as an attitudinal conglomerate. Although there are numerous studies on authoritarianism in the Spanish language, none of them has carried out a systematic review on the history of this construct. That is why the objective of this work was to carry out a review on the study of authoritarianism from psychological approaches.

Keywords


social psychology, authoritarianism



DOI: https://doi.org/10.62174/%7bpsocial}.v5i1.3454

References


Adorno, T., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. & Sanford, R. (1950). The authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper.

Ahrens, C. R. & Innes, J. M. (1994). Attribution of right-wing authoritarianism as a function of self-perceived political opinion. Journal of Social Psychology, 134, 383-385.

Asbrock, F., Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2010). Right‐wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice: A longitudinal test. European Journal of Personality: Published for the European Association of Personality Psychology, 24(4), 324-340.

Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-Wing Authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.

Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Altemeyer, B. (1996). The Authoritarian Spectre. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Brewer, M. B. (2001). "Ingroup identification and intergroup conflict: When does ingroup love become outgroup hate?", en: Ashmore, R. y Jussim, L. (eds.). Social identity, intergroup conflict, and conflict reduction. Nueva York, NY: Oxford University Press. p. 17-41.

Cabot, M. (2007). Más que palabras. Estética en tiempos de cultura audiovisual. Murcia: Cendeac.

Cantal, C., Milfont, T. L., Wilson, M. S., & Gouveia, V. V. (2015). Differential effects of Right‐Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation on dimensions of generalized prejudice in Brazil. European Journal of Personality, 29(1), 17-27.

Christie, R., & Jahoda, M. (1954). Studies in the scope and method of “The Authoritarian Personality”. Glencoe, Il: Free Press.

Cohrs, J. C., & Asbrock, F. (2009). Right‐wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and prejudice against threatening and competitive ethnic groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(2), 270-289.

Corrales, J. (2005). In Search of a Theory of Polarization: Lessons from Venezuela, 1999-2005. European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, (79), 105–118. DOI: http://doi.org/10.18352/erlacs.9666

Corrales, J., & Penfold, M. (2011). Dragon in the Tropics: Hugo Chávez and the Political Economy of Revolution in Venezuela. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.

Cramer, D. (2004). Emotional support, conflict, depression and relationship satisfaction in a romantic partner. Journal of Psychology, 138(6), 532-542.

Deutsch, K. W., Platt, J., & Senghass, D. (1971). Conditions favoring major advances in Social Science. Science, 171, 450-459.

DiRenzo, G. J. (1967). Professional politicians and personality structures. American Journal of Sociology, 73, 217-225.

Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. Em M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 41- 113. San Diego: Academic Press.

Duckitt, J. (2006). Differential Effects of Right Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation on Outgroup Attitudes and Their Mediation by Threat From and Competitiveness to Outgroups. Personality & social psychology bulletin, 32. 684-96.

Duckitt, J. (2009). Authoritarianism and dogmatism. In M. Leary & R. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of Individual Differences in Social Behavior (pp. 298-317). New York: Guilford Press.

Duckitt, J., Bizumic, B., Krauss, S. W., & Heled, E. (2010). A Tripartite Approach to Right-Wing Authoritarianism: The Authoritarianism-Conservatism-Traditionalism Model. Political Psychology, 31(5), 685-715. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00781.x.

Duckitt, J. & Fisher, K. (2003). The impact of social threat on world view and ideological attitudes. Political Psychology, 24, 199-222.

Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2007). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. European Journal of

Personality, 21, 113-130.

Duriez, B., & Van Hiel, A. (2002). The march of modern fascism: A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1199-1213.

Eysenck, H. J. (1954). The Psychology of Politics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Feldman, R. (2003). Enforcing social conformity: A theory of authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 24, 41-74.

Ferguson, C. J. y Dyck, D. (2012). Paradigm change in aggression research: The time has come to retire the General Aggression Model. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17, 220-228. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2012.02.007

Ferri, E. (1887). Los nuevos horizontes del derecho y el procedimiento penal, Madrid, Centro Editorial de Góngora. p. 28. También SC., II, p. 8.

Finlayson, J. G. (2005). Habermas: a very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Freud, S. (1921/1998). Psicología de las masas y análisis del yo. En J. Strachey (Ed.) Obras completas de Sigmund Freud. Volumen XVIII. Más allá del principio de placer, Psicología de las masas y análisis del yo, y otras obras (1920-1922). Buenos Aires: Amorrortu editores.

Fromm, E. (1941/2008). El miedo a la libertad. Buenos Aires: Paidós.

Funke, F. (2005). The dimensionality of right-wing authoritarianism: lessons from the dilemma between theory and measurement. Political Psychology, 26, 195-218.

Giampaglia, G. & Roccato, M. (2002). La scala di autoritarismo di destra di Altemeyer: Un’analisi con il modello di Rasch per la costruzione di una versione italiana. Testing, psicometria e metodologia, 9, 93-111.

Gómez, R. (1998). Weber, Lukács y la Escuela de Frankfurt. Herencias no reconocidas y diferencias teóricas desde una perspectiva práctico-política. Revista Herramienta, 34. Recuperado de http://www.herramienta.com.ar/revista-herramienta-n-34/we-ber-lu-kacs-y-la-es-cue-la-de-frank-furt-he-ren-cias-no-re-co-no-ci-das-.

Heaven, P. C. L., & Bucci, S. (2001). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and personality: An analysis using the IPIP measure. European Journal of Personality, 15, 49-56.

Heaven, P. C. L., & Connors, J. C. (2001). A note on the value correlates of Social Dominance Orientation and Right wing Authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 925-930.

Horkheimer, M. (1936/1972). Critical Theory: Selected Essays. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.

Kteily, N., Sidanius, J., & Levin, S. (2011). Social dominance orientation: Cause or ‘mere effect’?: Evidence for SDO as a causal predictor of prejudice and discrimination against ethnic and racial outgroups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 47. 208-214. 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.09.009.

Le Bon, G. (1895/2012). The Crowd: Study of the Popular Mind. EE.UU.: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.

Manganelli Rattazzi, A. M., Bobbio, A., & Canova, L. (2007). A short version of the Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1223-1234.

Mavor, K., Louis, W. & Sibley, C. (2010). A bias-corrected exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of right wing authoritarianism: Support for a three-factor structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 28-33. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.08.006.

Mayorga, R. A. (2009) Sociedad civil y Estado bajo un populismo plebiscitario y autoritario en Cynthia Arnson (ed.): La Nueva izquierda en América Latina: Derechos humanos, participación política y sociedad civil, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, DC, 109-119.

McFarland, S. G., Ageyev, V. S., & Djintcharadze, N. (1996).Russian authoritarianism two years after communism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 210-217.

Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to Authority. NY: Harper Row.

Perry, R., & Sibley, C. (2012). Big-Five personality prospectively predicts Social Dominance Orientation and Right-Wing Authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences. 52. 3–8. 10.1016/j.paid.2011.08.009.

Perry, R., & Sibley, C. G. (2013). A dual‐process motivational model of social and economic policy attitudes. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 13(1), 262-285.

Petersen, L. E., & Dietz, J. (2000). Social discrimination in a personnel selection context: The effects of an authority's instruction to discriminate and followers.

Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M. y Malle, B. F. (1994). Social Dominance Orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.67.4.741

Reich, W. (1933/1980). The mass psychology of fascism. UK: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Rokeach, M. (1948). Generalized mental rigidity as a factor in ethnocentrism. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 43, 259-278.

Rokeach, M. (1952). Dogmatism and opinionation on the left and on the right. American Psychologist, 7, 310.

Rokeach, M. (1960). The open and closed mind. New York: Basic Book Inc.

Rubinstein, G. (2003). Authoritarianism and its relation to creativity: A comparative study among students of design, behavioral sciences and law. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 695-705.

Sears, D. O., Huddy, L., & Jervis, R. (2003). Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Seoane, J., & Garzón, A. (1992). Escala de Autoritarismo de Derechas (RWA). Adaptación de la escala de B. Altemeyer. Psicología Política, 5, 27-52.Shills, E. (1954). Authoritarianism: Right and left. Em Richard Christie., & Marie Jahoda (Eds.), Studies in the scope and method of “The authoritarian Personality” (pp. 24-29). Glencoe: Free Press.

Sibley, C. G. & Duckitt, J. (2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 248–279.

Sibley, C. G. & Duckitt, J. (2009). Big-five personality, social worldviews, and ideological attitudes: Further tests of a dual process cognitive-motivational model. The Journal of Social Psychology, 149, 545–561.

Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2010). The personality bases of ideology: A one-year longitudinal study. The Journal of Social Psychology, 150(5), 540-559.

Sibley, C. G. & Duckitt, J. (2013). The dual process model of ideology and prejudice: A longitudinal test during a global recession. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153, 448–466.

Sibley, C. G., Harding, J. F., Perry, R., Asbrock, F. & Duckitt, J. (2010). Personality and prejudice: Extension to the HEXACO personality model. European Journal of Personality, 24, 515–534.

Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance. Cambridge, MASS: Cambridge University Press.

Sidanius, J. y Pratto, F. (2004). "Social Dominance Theory: a new synthesis", en Jost, J. y Sidanius, J. (eds.). Political Psychology. Nueva York, NY: Psychology Press. p. 315-332. doi: 10.1017/ CBO9781139175043.002

Sighele, E. (1890/2006). La muchedumbre delincuente. Madrid: La España moderna.

Smith, A. G., & Winter, D. G. (2002). Right-wing authoritarianism, party identification and attitudes toward feminism in student evaluations of the Clinton-Lewinsky story. Political Psychology, 23, 355-383.

Stone, W. F., Lederer, G., & Christie, R. (1993). Strength and weakness: The authoritarian personality today. New York: Springer Verlag.

Šubrt, J. (2001). The Problem of Time from the Perspective of the Social Sciences. Czech Sociological Review, 9(2), 211-224.

Ungaretti, J., Etchezahar, E., & Brussino, S. (2015). La percepción de peligro y competencia como factores predictores del prejuicio hacia diferentes grupos sociales. Escritos de Psicología - Psychological Writings, 8 (1), 30-37.

Van Hiel, A., Cornelis, I., & Roets, A. (2007). The intervening role of social worldviews in the relationship between the five-factor model of personality and social attitudes. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 21(2), 131–148.

Van Hiel, A., Duriez, B., & Kossowska, M. (2006). The presence of LeftWing authoritarianism in Western Europe and its relationship whit Conservative ideology. Political Psychology, 27, 769-793.

Weyland, K. (2013). Latin America’s Authoritarian Drift: The Threat from the Populist Left. Journal of Democracy, (3), 18-32.

Whitley, B. E. (1999). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(1), 126-134.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Estadísticas
Visitas al Abstract:2036
PDF (Español (España)):1239


{PSOCIAL} Journal of Research in Social Psychology. Faculty of Social Sciences | University of Buenos Aires (UBA)

ISSN 2422-619X. Semiannual publication (January-June and July-December).
 
Design: Mae Bermudez
 
 Jorunal Indexed and listed in:
  • ERIH PLUS (European Reference Index for the Humanities and Social Sciences) [registry]
  • Latindex Catálogo 2.0 (Regional Cooperative Online Information System for Scholarly Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portuga) [registry]
  • DOAJ (Directory Open Access Journals) [registry]
  • MIAR (Information Matrix for the Analysis of Journals) [registry]
  • PSICODOC (Online Bibliographic Database Madrid Official College of Psychologists) [registry] 
  • RDIUBA (Institutional Digital Repository) [registry]
  • REDIB (Iberoamerican Network for Innovation and Scientific Knowledge) [registry]
  • Open AIRE (Open Access Infraestructure for Research in Europe) [registry] 
  • Red LatinRev / FLACSO library (Latin American Faculty of Social Sciences) [registry]
  • BINPAR (National Bibliography of Registered Periodicals) [registry]
  • LATINOAMERICANA (Association of Academic Journals of Humanities and Social Sciences) [registry]
  • CLASE (Latin-American Citations in Social Sciences and Humanities) [registry]
  • Sherpa Romeo [registry]
  • Basic Nucleus of Argentine Scientific Journals [registry]
  • Mirab@l [registry]
  • Cabells' Journalytics [registry]
  • CIRC (Integrated Classification of Scientific Journals) [registry]
  • AmeliCA [registry]
  • LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature [registry]
  • EBSCO (Elton Bryson Stephens Company Information Services) [registry]
  • Malena [registry] 
  • Sara Network [registry]
  • SciELO (Scientific Electronic Library Online) [registry]
  • Redalyc (Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America and the Caribbean, Spain and. Portuga) [registry]
 

This journal is licenced under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)